A PROPOSAL FOR :
A Club Having Multiple All-Breed Shows the Same Day
The DSSA has proposed AKC consider allowing some clubs to have two all-breed shows on the same day. Numerous shows around the country have experienced continued drops in the number of entries to the level that some shows are half the size they were five to 10 years ago. In 2005 there were 126 clubs that had 600 or less dogs. In 2009 that figure rose to 226 and in 2012 there were 313 clubs with 600 or less dogs. The trend continues comparing all breed shows held through September 22, 2013 there were 262 shows with 600 or less dogs compared to 236 for the same corresponding period in 2012. In addition, as entries decline and shows become smaller, sponsorship is also declining. More all-breed clubs will be forced to cease holding shows if something is not done to help them with finances. The loss of shows will lead to a loss of active clubs in all areas of the country which in turn means a loss of people to voice the message regarding the value in owning and registering a purebred dog and, in turn, fewer people to purchase purebred dogs.
Many of the overhead costs remain the same with the clubs having excess capacity with show grounds. Given adequate ring space and an appropriate number of judges, multiple-event days can be successfully managed within reasonable time limits for the welfare of the dogs and exhibitors. Numerical (and some time) limits could be imposed for each show based on available resources. AKC has already set a precedent in permitting two obedience trials in one day as well as concurrent classes for specialty shows held with all-breed shows. Multiple all-breed shows would occur within normal show hours resulting in no more stress on dogs and exhibitors than a normal dog show.
Among the benefits of Multiple-show days:
Another argument is clubs having to hire more multiple group judges. Not so. Clubs are presently contracting for panels to cover multiple days. They are not hiring only multiple group judges. Could there be overloads? Yes, but entries are down so much that many judges frequently have much time left at the end of their assignments. If clubs choose their panels and assigns the breeds carefully, and take advantage of the many provisional assignments available, you may find there's more opportunity for more judges to judge. Another argument is the day would be too long. We presently do shows with 1500, 2500, 3000 dogs in one day now. Certainly, using two 600-dog events as an example, we can get 1200 done in a day. And, just as it is now, depending upon the space at the show site, if more rings are an option, the day could finish earlier. In addition, the opportunity of showing a dog twice in one day means they will not be confined to their crates for such long periods of time stretched over the day.
The DSSA strongly believes this concept could help shore up some of the clubs that are dying or in (or about to be in) dire straits due to their declining entries. We would like to see the idea at least be given a reasonable test (perhaps a year) before making a final decision. We know there are clubs now that would like to have the opportunity to give this a try. We all must be flexible enough and willing to try new things if we are going to keep the sport alive.
For comments please feel free to contact us at:firstname.lastname@example.org